Insights

IP news and practical perspectives on patents and trademarks.

446 articles

Q & A

Searching Figurative Trademarks by Image

Question: When conducting a similarity search for a figurative trademark on the China Trademark Website of the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), can a trademark image file be uploaded to perform the search?

Read article ↗

Q & A

Time Limits for Changing Inventors

Question: What are the time limits for changing inventors in a Chinese patent application? Will a request filed after the prescribed deadline necessarily be refused?

Read article ↗

IP News

China IP Data Express

〇In November 2025, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) announced that the average examination period for invention patents in China …

Read article ↗

IP News

Patent Examination and Grant Statistics of the IP5 Offices

According to the 2023 IP5 Statistics Report jointly issued by the world's five major intellectual property offices (IP5), a comparison of China's invention patent grant rate and examination time with the other four patent offices reveals that China's patent examination speed ranks second fastest among the IP5, trailing only Japan while surpassing South Korea and Europe.

Read article ↗

Q & A

Foreign Evidence of Prior Public Use in Invalidation Proceedings

Question: I would like to file an invalidation request against a certain patent, relying on evidence of prior public use to argue that the patent lacks novelty. However, the evidence of prior public use is not from China, but from the United States and Europe. Would such evidence obtained outside China be disqualified or disregarded by the Chinese examiner?

Read article ↗

Q & A

Requesting Deferred Patent Examination

Question: I would like to request a deferred examination for a Chinese invention application, hoping to postpone the examination as much as possible. Is there a way to do so? If yes, what is the maximum duration for which the examination can be deferred?

Read article ↗

Q & A

Assignment Documents at PCT National Phase Entry

Question: A PCT application is going to enter the Chinese national phase, and the applicants were two Japanese companies A and B when filing the PCT application. However, at the PCT international stage, the procedure of change of applicants was carried out, and the application was transferred from companies A and B to company A, then the International Bureau (IB) issued the Notification of Change (Form PCT/IB/306). In this case, is it still necessary to submit the documents proving the transfer of the application right to the CNIPA when entering the Chinese national phase?

Read article ↗

Q & A

Combining Patent Term Adjustment and Extension

Question: If a patent qualifies for both patent term adjustment (PTA) and pharmaceutical patent term extension (PTE) under Article 42 of the Chinese Patent Law, must the patentee choose one, or can both periods be added together?

Read article ↗

IP News

CNIPA Publishes the 2022 Annual Report

In June 2023, the China National Intellectual Property Administration(CNIPA) published its 2022 Annual Report, containing the following important information related to patents.

Read article ↗

Q & A

Online Software Copyright Registration

Question: It is said that in China, software copyright registrations are handled online from June 1, 2023, and the China Copyright Protection Center (CPCC) will no longer accept mailed materials for software copyright registration from June 1. After the software copyright registration becomes paperless, what is the requirement on the applicant's signature? Can electronic seals or electronic signatures be used in uploaded application materials?

Read article ↗

IP News

Top PCT filers in China

On February 28, 2023, the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) released its latest report in Geneva, which stated that in 2022, the number of international patent applications submitted by China through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) reached 70,015, an increase of 0.6% year-on-year, and continued to rank first in the world.

Read article ↗

Q & A

Service of Non-Use Notices for Madrid Trademarks

Question: I have a Madrid international registered trademark and obtain the extension protection in China. Now someone has filed a cancellation application against the mark in China based on the ground of non-use for three consecutive years, to whom will the Chinese Trademark Office send the Notification of Submission of Proof of Use?

Read article ↗

Q & A

Invalidation Deadlines After Trademark Opposition

Question: According to Article 45 of the Chinese Trademark Law, the period for filing a request for invalidation of a registered trademark is five years from the date of registration of the trademark. We would like to know, for the trademark registered after the opposition procedure, how to determine the starting date of the five years (i.e., the date of registration)?

Read article ↗

IP News

CNIPA released IP data in 2021

CNIPA released the statistical data of intellectual property related work in 2021. By the end of 2021, the statistics of Chinese patents, trademarks and other i…

Read article ↗

IP News

CNIPA Publishes the 2020 Annual Report

In April 2021, the China National Intellectual Property Administration(CNIPA) published its 2020 Annual Report, containing the following important information related to patents and trademarks. ● Patent 1.497 million invention patent applications were filed in 2020, up 6.9% year-on-year.

Read article ↗

IP News

Statistics on PPH requests in China

According to the statistics of Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) provided by CNIPA, by the end of December 2019, CNIPA has received 37,265 PPH requests, includin…

Read article ↗

Q & A

Scope of Provisional Patent Protection

Question: If the protection scope claimed by the applicant at the time of publication of the invention patent application is inconsistent with the protection scope of the patent right at the time of the announcement of grant of the invention patent, how to determine that the doer has exploited the patent during the temporary protection period (i.e. the period from the date of publication of the invention patent application to the date of announcement of grant of the invention patent)?

Read article ↗

IP News

Who is the main player of AI in China?

On November 13, 2020, China Industrial Control Systems Cyber Emergency Response Team(CICS-CERT) released "Analysis Report on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology for Chinese Patent Applications (2020)"(hereinafter referred to as the Report), showing the new trend of innovation and development in the field of AI in China. ● China's Patent Applications in AI The number of Chinese patent applications in the field of AI is on the rise year by year.

Read article ↗

Q & A

Amendments in Multi-Class Trademark Applications

Question: A trademark application covers three classes, but the Trademark Office requires an amendment to the identification of goods in only one class. If the amendment is not filed or is not accepted, will the other two classes be affected?

Read article ↗

IP News

Beijing Intellectual Property Court Reports Growth in Foreign-Related Cases

The Beijing Intellectual Property Court, established in November 2014, not only has jurisdiction over civil and administrative cases of intellectual property rights in Beijing, but also has exclusive jurisdiction over administrative cases of granting and confirmation of intellectual property rights throughout the country.

Read article ↗

IP News

CNIPA’s November 2019 Draft Examination Rules for AI, Algorithms and Business Methods

Invention patent applications involving new technologies such as artificial intelligence, or involving new formats, new fields are distinctly different from other invention patent applications, the characteristic of which is, besides technologies, rules and methods for mental activities such as algorithms or commercial methods are generally included in their invention solutions.

Read article ↗

IP News

Chinese Patent Applications Filed Abroad, 2014–2017

As shown in the figure below, the overall trend of invention patent applications from Chinese applicants to foreign countries is on the rise, among which the top five destinations are the United States, the European Patent Office, Japan, South Korea and India.

Read article ↗

IP News

China Issues Commercial 5G Licences

China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT)issued the 5G licenses to China Telecom, China Mobile, China Unicom, and China Broadcasting Network on Thursday, June 6, 2019.

Read article ↗

IP News

SIPO Renamed as CNIPA

Following the restructuring approved by the 13th National People’s Congress, the State Intellectual Property Office of China (SIPO) adopted the English name China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) on August 29, 2018.

Read article ↗

Q & A

Division of Trademark Applications in China

Question: I have two questions about divisional trademark applications in China: 1) If the designated goods or services in the original application are described using broader terms, can narrower terms be used in the divisional application? 2) A divisional application retains the original filing date. Can the application be divided an unlimited number of times?

Read article ↗

Q & A

China’s Patent Examination Cooperation Centers

Question: I understand that substantive examination of invention patent applications is mainly carried out by Patent Examination Cooperation Centers. How many of these centers are there in China, and how many invention applications do they examine?

Read article ↗

IP News

China fines packaging giant for monopoly

China's State Administration for Industry and Commerce has fined packaging giant Tetra Pak 668 million yuan ($97 million) for breaking anti-monopoly laws and abusing its monopolistic market

Read article ↗

Q & A

If a Chinese application (parent application) has been rejected for more than one year, and its divisional application has been filed, when can the applicant file another divisional application from the first filed divisional application?

Question: If a Chinese application (parent application) has been rejected for more than one year, and its divisional application has been filed, when can the applicant file another divisional application from the first filed divisional application?

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Service Inventions in China: Rewards and Remuneration

Under Article 6 of the Patent Law of the People’s Republic of China, an invention-creation made in the course of performing an entity’s tasks, or mainly by using that entity’s material and technical resources, is a service invention-creation. “Invention-creation” includes inventions, utility models and designs.

Read article ↗

Q & A

Can a Chinese patent application be published five or six months after filing?

Question: In a pending US application, published Chinese application CN101XXXX00A has been cited against us. It appears to have been filed in July 2010, but bears a publication date of December 29, 2010. We understand that applications are normally published after 18 months. Is the publication date wrong, or can an application be published so quickly?

Read article ↗

IP News

China was the largest destination for Korean overseas trademark filings

According to the Korean Intellectual Property Office’s release of September 12, 2013, Korean applicants filed 49,617 patent applications abroad in 2011. The United States was the largest destination, with 27,289 applications, approximately 55% of the total. China accounted for 16.4%, Japan for 10.1%, and the European Patent Office for 9.9%. These figures concern Korean applicants filing abroad, rather than foreign applicants filing in Korea.

Read article ↗

IP News

IP5 offices agree to launch a joint Patent Prosecution Highway pilot

At their meeting in Geneva on September 23, 2013, the five IP5 offices—the European Patent Office, Japan Patent Office, Korean Intellectual Property Office, China’s State Intellectual Property Office, and United States Patent and Trademark Office—agreed to launch a comprehensive Patent Prosecution Highway pilot in January 2014.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Calculating patent annuities in China: comparison with Japan

When calculating annuities for a client’s quotation, take care to use the correct starting point for each patent year. In China, years are counted from the filing date. In Japan, the first fee year begins with registration. The following example illustrates the difference; the appendix sets out the Chinese and Japanese fee schedules used in this article.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Alternative protection routes for product designs in China

Designs are protected under China’s Patent Law. Article 2 defines a design as a new design of the shape, pattern, or their combination, or the combination of colour with shape and pattern, of a product that creates an aesthetic effect and is suitable for industrial application. A design granted a Chinese patent is protected by the Patent Law.

Read article ↗

IP News

Beijing Third Intermediate People’s Court established in August 2013

In 2011, Beijing’s First and Second Intermediate People’s Courts concluded 60,000 cases, an increase of 485% over 1995, when the former Beijing Intermediate People’s Court was divided into two courts. To address the rapidly growing caseload, the Beijing Third Intermediate People’s Court was established on August 6, 2013, and opened on August 21, 2013.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Confidentiality examination before filing a patent application outside China

The third revision of China’s Patent Law, which took effect on October 1, 2009, introduced confidentiality examination for an invention or utility model developed in China before a patent application is filed abroad. Such an application may be filed abroad only after compliance with the confidentiality-examination requirements. Breaching the requirement can prevent a corresponding Chinese application from being granted; a granted patent may also be invalidated on that ground. An invention or utility model developed in China is one whose substantive technical content was developed within China.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Determining whether an invention or utility model was developed in China

Rule 8 of the Implementing Regulations explains the confidentiality-examination requirement in Article 20 of China’s Patent Law. An invention or utility model developed in China is one whose substantive technical content was developed within China. For this purpose, the original article refers to the territory within mainland China’s customs boundary, excluding Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan.

Read article ↗

IP News

Medical devices recorded the largest increase in patent filings in 2012

Thomson Reuters’ Intellectual Property & Science business released its 2012 State of Innovation report, analysing global patent activity in 2012. Innovation in medical-device technology continued to grow rapidly. Patent filings in this field increased by 15.7% compared with 2011, the largest increase among the technology fields covered.

Read article ↗

IP News

China received 698 merger-control notifications by March 2013

The Ministry of Commerce published information on completed antimonopoly reviews of concentrations of business operators. From the implementation of the Anti-Monopoly Law in 2008 to March 31, 2013, the Ministry received 698 notifications, formally accepted 627 cases and concluded 579. Of the concluded cases, 562 were approved unconditionally, accounting for 97.1%; 16 were approved subject to conditions; and one was prohibited.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Deleting a technical feature: assessing added matter through a case study

After filing an invention application, an applicant has several opportunities to amend the application on their own initiative, e.g., when a request for substantive examination is made or within three months after the application enters substantive examination, or when a PCT application enters the national phase or when a divisional application is filed. Generally, compared with amendments made in response to an office action, the amendments on one’s own initiative have fewer restrictions. For example, the applicant may amend or remove a technical feature within the content of the application as filed to expand the scope of the protection, or add a new dependent claim, etc., as long as the amendments to the application document of the invention or utility model do not go beyond the scope of disclosure contained in the initial description and claims.

Read article ↗

IP News

China’s State Council revises three copyright regulations

China’s State Council revised three sets of copyright regulations: the Implementing Regulations of the Copyright Law, the Regulations on the Protection of the Right of Communication through Information Networks, and the Regulations on Computer Software Protection. The amendments took effect on March 1, 2013.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Pledges over patent rights in China

Chinese law generally adopts a “contract plus publicity” model, through delivery or registration, for creating security rights. A contract to pledge patent rights is therefore an important requirement for creating a patent pledge.

Read article ↗

IP News

SIPO receives 14% more PCT applications in 2012

SIPO received 19,926 PCT applications in 2012, an increase of 14.0% over the previous year. Domestic applicants filed 18,145, representing 91.1% of the total and an increase of 12.8%. Foreign applicants filed 1,781, up 28.7%.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Post-grant procedures for standard patents in Hong Kong

Hong Kong’s patent system in 2013 provides standard patents and short-term patents. The Patents Registry of the Intellectual Property Department handles registration. Although the Patents Ordinance sets requirements such as novelty and inventive step, the Department examines formalities rather than conducting substantive examination of those requirements before grant.

Read article ↗

Trademark Insights

Examining identical and similar composite trademarks in China

Article 8 of the Trademark Law described in this article permits registration of visual signs capable of distinguishing one person’s goods or services from those of others, including words, designs, letters, numbers, three-dimensional signs, colour combinations and combinations of these elements. A composite mark combines different elements, such as wording and a design.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Obtaining Chinese patent prosecution files online

The European, US and Japanese patent offices provide online access to prosecution files. SIPO launched the Chinese version of the China Patent Inquiry System (CPQUERY) on April 27, 2012, providing access to some file documents, such as office actions. The English interface followed on November 29, 2012. This article introduces the basic search method using that interface.

Read article ↗

Q & A

Must a design created in China be filed in China first?

Question: A German client has a Chinese subsidiary, where a Chinese employee created a design. The client normally first files a Community design application and then files a Chinese design application claiming priority from it. Does Chinese law require a Chinese designer to file the first design application in China?

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Points to consider when filing a design application in China

In China, SIPO grants design patents after preliminary examination, without substantive examination. This may leave the resulting rights vulnerable and has been accompanied by increasing invalidation proceedings and litigation. Drawing on the Patent Law, the examination guidelines and our practice, this article discusses points to consider when filing, with a view to effective enforcement.

Read article ↗

IP News

Chinese patent documents added to PCT minimum documentation

On July 1, 2012, Chinese patent documents were formally added to the minimum documentation under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). They thereby became part of the documentation that International Searching Authorities must search when examining international patent applications. China became the eleventh country or institution whose patent documents were included in the PCT minimum documentation.

Read article ↗

IP News

Measures for prioritised examination of invention patent applications take effect on August 1, 2012

The State Intellectual Property Office (SIPO) has issued the Measures for the Administration of Prioritised Examination of Invention Patent Applications. The Measures provide an expedited examination route for important applications with significant economic and social implications, including those concerning strategic emerging industries and green technologies. They are intended to promote the practical application of scientific and technological achievements and the development of these industries and technologies.

Read article ↗

IP News

Chinese patent applications and grants in the first half of 2012

In the first half of 2012, China received 857,000 applications for the three types of patents—invention patents, utility models and designs—an increase of 26.8% over the same period of the previous year. The number granted rose 19.1% to 530,000. Both applications and grants continued to grow.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Responding to office actions alleging lack of support

Examiners previously relied mainly on novelty and inventive step to prevent claims from having an excessively broad scope. Following the third amendment to the Chinese Patent Law, and particularly in 2011, objections that claims were not supported by the description became more frequent. More office actions challenged claims on the ground that their scope was too broad.

Read article ↗

Trademark Insights

Recognition of well-known trademarks in China

Under the Rules on the Recognition and Protection of Well-Known Trademarks, a well-known trademark is a mark widely known to the relevant public and enjoying a high reputation in China. The relevant public includes consumers of the goods or services bearing the mark, other operators producing those goods or providing those services, and sellers and other participants in the distribution channels.

Read article ↗

IP News

China’s first patent insurance claim is paid

The Guangdong branch of Cinda Property and Casualty Insurance Co., Ltd., the first insurer to introduce patent insurance in China, recently paid RMB 20,400 to Foshan New Concept Magnetoelectricity Equipment Co., Ltd. This was China’s first completed patent insurance compensation case.

Read article ↗

IP News

ZTE ranks fourth worldwide for smartphone patents

An analysis of nearly 40,000 global patent samples by SIPO’s Patent Examination Cooperation Center placed Samsung, LG, NEC, ZTE and Nokia as the top five smartphone patent applicants. ZTE ranked fourth worldwide and first among Chinese companies, with about 1,000 smartphone patents and substantial holdings in human–computer interaction and touch technologies.

Read article ↗

Trademark Insights

Choosing goods and services for a Chinese trademark application

China is a party to the Nice Agreement and applies the Nice Classification. The Chinese Trademark Office also uses its own Classification of Similar Goods and Services, based on the Nice Classification. Examiners apply strict standards to descriptions, so applicants should use the two classifications to help avoid office actions. The following practical points may assist.

Read article ↗

IP News

SIPO launches its patent examination complaints platform

SIPO’s patent examination quality complaints platform had operated well since its launch on July 22, 2011. To collect public complaints and suggestions about patent examination more comprehensively and continuously improve examination quality, SIPO upgraded the service to the Patent Examination Complaints Platform, which formally began operating on January 20, 2012.

Read article ↗

IP News

China shortens trademark examination to ten months

Since 2011, the Chinese Trademark Office has improved examination efficiency, shortening trademark examination to ten months and reducing the time for handling oppositions and disputes to under 18 months. These periods have reached international levels.

Read article ↗

Patent Insights

Assessing design patent infringement

Assessing design patent infringement generally involves two questions: whether the accused product’s design is identical or similar to the patented design, and whether the accused product and the product covered by the patent are of identical or similar types. These are central and difficult issues in judicial practice. This article examines several related points.

Read article ↗

Q & A

Amending Chinese claims to correspond to Japanese claims for PPH

Question: A Chinese application based on a Japanese application corresponds to the text originally filed with the JPO. However, amendments during Japanese prosecution mean that its claims no longer correspond to those allowed in Japan. China offers limited opportunities for voluntary amendment. If three months have passed since receipt of the Notice of Entry into Substantive Examination, how can the applicant make the Chinese claims sufficiently correspond to the Japanese claims for a PPH request?

Read article ↗

Let’s discuss your IP needs.

Email our team